Management of rivalries of great power is an essential part of international relationships. The general preferences are the use of effective deterrence, diplomacy, multilateralism, Pacific settlement of disputes and the end of wars in order to support a rules base global order, governance of global commons and bring the weak to the judiciary, while the misconduct for their actions are folded into account. It is now difficult to say whether the aspiring multipolar order is built on the Westphalian concept of the sovereignty of states and the balance of power or the presentation of Hugo Grotius by a society of socialized states, in the individual in the sovereign states that the Confuzian Harmony and Society in the community, which is the community of the community of community of community Community of the community of the community of the community of the community of the community of the community of the community or even judges or even judges or even judges or even judges.
This disorder is stimulated by geopolitical disputes, state fragility through internal conflicts, competitive managers, growing fraud and the inability of the managers to raise the standard of living. Unnoticed nation competition for profit without thinking about the common good can fight, not to disorder, not to stable peace. A stable world order requires certain values, institutions and rules of engagement between the USA, China and Russia and other powers of various scales. The approach of American President Donald Trump to foreign policy is to redefine a new context of international relationships. His business -like approach to state art has consequences for the global order, which was previously shaped by a network of allies and intraatlantic consensus on liberal order with common security, democracy and human rights, market economy and trade liberalization.
Crack in intraatlantic security
Now you can see a crack in the intraatlantic security and value architecture with its different approach to Ukraine, NATO and the UN-ROLLE. President Trump has blamed Ukraine for the cause of the conflict and did not include it and Europe in the negotiation of the US Russia. The US defense minister Pete Hegseth Castle Kyiv, who joined NATO and saved the lost area, because America concentrated on its limits and detered the war with China. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in view of the increase in multidimensional power as the greatest threat to the United States, aims to work with Indo-Pacific allies to strengthen Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, India and Australia. These nations acted against all powers that are unfriendly for American interests.
China, Russia, North Korea and Iran's convergent interest, Russia has helped to be silent to Asia and to avert every contamination plan. Many members of the global south will continue to enjoy China's global initiatives, considering that China has political will and resources to carry them out and contribute to sustainable destinations of the UN. The strategic ambiguity of the United States towards Taiwan, trade and tariffs as well as artificial intelligence with China remains. Its solution is of crucial importance to promote reconciliation in the Indopazacific. The Middle East shows a growing geopolitical complexity that is caused by the United States and Israel on the one hand and the Islamic states and whose state non-state armed actors on the other and endeavors to dominate the region instead of finding a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine.
In South Asia, India strives to make the nation big again, but its responsibility lies in the promotion of non-recurrent bonds that occur from the Gujral teaching, respect their sensitivity and efforts and strengthen mutual help. His strategic affinity for the United States to acquire muscle strength can stimulate a malignant arms. China's connections to Asean, African and Latin American nations are based on common interests in security, infrastructures, connectivity, energy, finance, green technologies and development. Trading in the Pacific region is higher than in the entire Atlantic. NATO and the EU claim that permanent peace in the region requires peace in the Middle East, East Asia and the full sovereignty of Ukraine. President Trump has proposed that Iran does not pursue nuclear ambitions.
What leverage do the EU and NATO have in other Ukraine peace negotiations as diplomatic efforts in the United Nations and outside of central importance? In view of the constructive plan of President Trump for the historical opponent of Russia and his support for the latter in the United Nations in Europe in Europe, how Europe can be effective? President Trump has put several great strategies in progress: Open support for far right populist parties in Europe and the world, starting with the dialogue between the top officials of the United States and Russia, who aim to resume all parameters of ties, to start economic cooperation, to prepare artificial obstacles to the work of the embassies, to prepare the artificial obstacles to the messages of the other, And all sources of Ukraine conflicts in Ukraine and the division of Ukraine and the fight against residence in Ukraine and the aspects of Ukraine.
His criticism of European nations that he did not pretend their defense spending on NATO and the over -regulation of trade and tariffs caused him to collect against them and other mutual tariffs. He also suspended American help for most nations for three months because he had not geared towards the national interests of the United States instead of supporting the deep state. His statement of integrating Canada as the 51st state of the United States controlled Panama Canal, Gulf of Mexico and Greenland to force his hegemony in Latin America, but inspired the global south and the Brics to choose the non-western way of multilateralism, based on sovereignty and trade in its currency.
President Trump's groundbreaking movements have alienated allies. It is not yet possible to see whether its enemies will inspire to use his line to fulfill his goal of making America great again. His withdrawal from the WHO, the Human Rights Council and the Paris climate agreement is a deviation from America's ability to shape humanitarian and international laws. The weakening of the United Nations can influence their credibility and ability to control global governance. The American aversion to participation in the G-20 meeting in South Africa can be attributed to what it describes as a “anti-American role”. But it is a good opportunity for South Africa to stage its diplomatic attitude in global politics. President Trump does not consider Russia as an attacker and indicates to invite it to the G7 summit, although the European leaders attach their defense against Russia, see US-Russian relaxation as a strategy for weakening. The United States is striving to raise all sanctions against Russia after a peace agreement has been made.
The American approach to the Munich Security Conference, which the US Vice President JD Vance unveiled, shows the American refusal to share European perception, and said that the threat to Europe is out of the inside and justifies the fall of its bureaucracy for democracy. America's persistent realism has played its central role in the Atlantic community and in the Allianz due to its federal budget and trade deficits and the rise of loans to around $ 37 trillion. The European nations keep the Russian ambition to restore their earlier fame as a threat to their security, democracy and economy. The European nations seem to be ready to send peace troops to the defense of Ukraine as soon as a peace agreement is signed. The United States is planning to withdraw its NATO armies from the Baltic region, and let Baltic and Nordic nations defend their defense and suggests that Ukraine enables an economic deal to repay the 180 -billion dollars and to enable America to access its critical minerals.
The American alienation from its allies has opened up the opportunity to build trading partnerships with Canada, Mexico and Europe after the ties in China Russia went beyond the borders and a neutral stand on Ukraine alienated many of them. The EU believes that China's support for Russia has strengthened its power, while the careful, measured step acts as a stabilizing force in world politics and maintains a balance with all nations for a win-win result. In this context, Trump sees Putin as an ally in order to strengthen his power to maintain global stability and not as a “Nixon in the other way round”, since Russia has taken his partnership with America on the same conditions and decided his relationships with China. The United States, China and Russia have relative advantages in various forms of power and cannot push each other back. However, their conflict, which alleviates structures and guidelines and respect for Westphalian and UN spirit for other nations, can restore global peace.
Adaptive strategies
Does the reset of the US Russia bonds inspire the Nepali political class to improve relationships with Russia or continue with decoupling policy and to remain apathetic? China and Russia had helped Nepal to achieve economic independence and diversification in international relations that had been lifted by the neoliberal dumplings of his political class. In the middle of a global geopolitical change, Nepal must develop suitable adaptive strategies. The Nepalese army has recently shown the growth of internal and security problems for the nation. The broader geopolitical change has brought the need for a coherent security strategy and coordination of all state authorities and stakeholders to promote national interests.
The budget restrictions after the withdrawal of the United States, the provincial voltages, the symptoms of the poor, several anomical movements, climate change and artificial intelligence are critical bottlenecks for effective government. President Trump has dropped 20 million US dollar support for Nepal Fiscal federalism as “fraud”, while the US Congressman Brian Mast requested the reasons from the former American government to grant a grant of $ 500,000 to promote atheism in Nepal. In response to this, the Nepalese government has instructed all of its administrative authorities to monitor the activities of Ingos and NGOs. The nation fell into the gray list of money laundering. In this context, the control of internal diseases, effective government and the balance of foreign policy are the rational steps for the safe future of Nepal.
(Former reader of the Ministry of Political Science, TU, writes Daal on political and social issues.)